Royal

The Royal Law Firm recently welcomed attorney Kylie Brown to its team.

Dec 01, 2023

“The leading rule for the lawyer, as for the man of every calling, is diligence.” – Abraham Lincoln

Kylie Brown is an attorney at The Royal Law Firm. With over a decade of legal experience, she is well versed in a variety of insurance defense work including Personal Injury, Employment Discrimination and Harassment, Products Liability, and Mass Torts. Her experience also includes Commercial Real Estate and Workers’ Compensation. Kylie specializes in Strategic Trial Planning and is a member of the litigation and appellate teams at Royal.

Kylie earned her Bachelor of Arts from Lasell College in Law and Public Affairs and her Juris Doctor from Western New England University School of Law. While in law school, Kylie served as Clerk of the Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity, President of the Alternative Spring Break Program, and Intern for the Hampden County Bar Association Pro Bono Committee focusing on public service and access to justice. She was the recipient of the HCBA Access to Justice Award in 2017, which was awarded for her collaborative work in reviewing and assessing the current pro bono efforts by the bar and drafting recommendations to better promote access to justice.

Outside of her practice, Kylie enjoys the outdoors, hiking with her dog Georgia and biking the bike trails. She also enjoys cooking, trying new recipes, and spending time with friends and family.

Education

J.D., Western New England University, Springfield, MA

B.A., Lasell College, Newton, MA


Admitted

Massachusetts

Connecticut

Rhode Island

Alabama


01 May, 2024
On April 29 th , 2024, the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) finalized their guidance in harassment in the workplace after receiving and responding to nearly 38,000 public comments on the proposed guidance released on October 2, 2023. The renewed guidance provides numerous clarifying hypotheticals, and addresses more recent issues including protections for LGBTIQA+ employees and remote work. Of note, the EEOC clarified the scope of sex discrimination and harassment, stating that federal protections under Title VII extend to LGBTIQA+ employees. Specifically, the EEOC made clear that the scope of harassment extends to repeatedly and intentionally misgendering employees or denying access to bathroom facilities that align with their gender identity. Further, this guidance reminds employers that discrimination and harassment based on “sex” includes harassment based on pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions, which include employees’ decisions related to contraception and abortion. Several public comments suggested that these guidelines infringed on free speech and religious rights. The EEOC did not directly address these concerns, instead stating that free speech and religious rights issues are fact-specific and would be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Further, the EEOC updated guidance related to the remote work environment. The EEOC clarified that conduct in a virtual work environment, including electronic communications using private phones, computers, or social media accounts can contribute to a hostile work environment if they impact the workplace. The EEOC also clarified that conduct occurring outside of the workplace, including on social media, which does not target the employer or its employees and is not brought into the workplace generally will not contribute to a hostile work environment. Finally, the EEOC updated its Anti-Harassment Policy Requirements, stating that an anti-harassment and discrimination policy should be widely disseminated to employees, in a manner that is understandable by all employees and includes i) a definition of prohibited conduct, ii) a requirement that supervisors report harassment, iii) multiple avenues for reporting harassment, iv) a statement that clearly identifies accessible points of contact for reporting purposes, and v) an explanation of the complaint process, including adequate anti-retaliation and confidentiality protections, and prompt and effective investigation and corrective action. You can read more about the EEOC's ruling on their website by clicking here . If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
26 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued a final rule banning non-competition agreements for all employees except for very narrow exceptions. The FTC’s Final Rule banning all non-competition agreements is effective 120 days after its publication in the Federal Register, which is expected in the next few days.  As of the effective date, all non-competition agreements are banned, except for franchisor/franchisee relationships and for sales of a business between buyer and seller. The FTC’s Rule is retroactive, prohibiting certain non-competition agreements before the effective date of the Rule as well. Existing non-competition agreements can remain in effect as to senior executives, which are defined in the Rule as employees in “policy-making positions” making at least $151,164 annually. The FTC’s Final Rule is already being challenged through the court system and a challenge from the Chamber of Commerce will most likely follow suit. Therefore, if an employer has existing non-competition agreements, the employer may not need to rescind them just yet. Stay tuned for updates as these challenges take their due course.
Share by: