Employers May be Liable When Customers Discriminate in the Workplace

September 30, 2022

The U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has recently filed a harassment suit against a nursing home located in Burlington, Vermont.


 The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Burlington establishes that Black nurses and staff were subjected to ongoing and egregious racial harassment at the hands of patients.



The suit alleges that starting in 2020, various white residents of the nursing home repeatedly berated Black nurses and nurse assistants with offensive racial slurs. Certain accounts of the events go as far as alleging that residents physically assaulted Black staff.


Managers of the nursing home observed the workers being subjected to the harassment. In August 2020, the managers attended a meeting in which the employees raised concerns over the harassment.


The EEOC has asserted within their suit, that the alleged conduct violates Title VII of that Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibiting employers from discriminating against employees based on race.

The EEOC is seeking compensatory damages for the employees and punitive damages to prevent future racial harassment in the workplace.


The law does not specify on how employers must respond when a third party, such as a customer, discriminates against their employee. In a restaurant or retail setting, it is likely that management may refuse service or ask a customer to leave.


Healthcare settings, such as a nursing home, pose unique challenges. What must be done when the actions observed are performed by a patient with dementia or some other cognitive impairment?

Regardless, healthcare facilities owe a duty of care to their employees, as well as their patients. For that reason, it is imperative that health care providers initiate policies to address abusive and combative patients. Employers have the duty to curb racial harassment even when perpetrated under the guise of mental deterioration.


If your business has any questions on this or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

December 5, 2025
Our attorneys successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of the Defendant from the Massachusetts Appeals Court in a Wage Act and contract dispute. The Complainant alleged entitlement to a substantial variable compensation award following resignation. We demonstrated that the compensation plan made such awards discretionary and contingent on continued employment at the time of payout. The Appeals Court agreed, finding that the award did not constitute wages under the Wage Act and that the Defendant acted lawfully in denying payment. All claims were dismissed in their entirety.
By The Royal Law Firm November 5, 2025
Attorney Amy Royal has once again been selected as a Super Lawyer ! As published by Super Lawyers Amy B. Royal is a top-rated attorney, with her firm headquartered in Springfield, Massachusetts. Providing legal representation in the New England states and New York, for a variety of different issues, Amy Royal was selected to Super Lawyers for 2014 - 2016, 2019 - 2025. Attorneys like Amy B. Royal are recognized by their peers for their outstanding work and commitment to the spirit of the legal profession. Their knowledge of the law, professional work ethic, and advocacy on behalf of their clients allow them to stand out among other attorneys in the field.