The Royal Law Firm was a Finalist for Best Law Firm in The Best of The Valley Readers' Poll for 2025, as published by the Valley Advocate! Thank you to everyone who voted for us, and to those of you who trust us to help you in times of need. Click here to check out all of the category winners and finalists.

Royal attorneys successfully obtained a dismissal at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination for their client. The Complainant alleged discrimination based on race, color, and retaliation. Royal attorneys argued that the Complainant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and complainant could not prove that they experienced an adverse employment action. The MCAD agreed with our argument and dismissed the case against our client due to a lack of probable cause.

The Royal Law Firm attorneys successfully obtained a dismissal on behalf of our client. The Complainant alleged discrimination based on disability. Royal attorneys argued that Complainant had failed to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, and that Complainant had engaged in misconduct warranting her termination. Royal attorneys further argued that Complainant did not demonstrate that she suffered from a disability, and that she could not perform the essential functions of her position. The EEOC agreed with our argument and dismissed the case against our client.

Royal attorneys successfully obtained a dismissal at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination for their small local client. The Complainants alleged discrimination on the basis of race and color. Royal attorneys argued that the Complainants contacted Respondent for an estimate for services to be performed; Respondent later turned down the work due to lack of time, not race or color, and offered to perform the work the following season. The MCAD agreed with our argument and dismissed the case against our client due to a lack of probable cause.

Royal attorneys successfully obtained summary judgment for a large corporation in Hampden Superior Court. Plaintiff claimed a violation of the Massachusetts Wage Act and breach of good faith and fair dealing in relation to a bonus that Plaintiff alleged was owed to him. Defendants had a policy in place that made this bonus completely discretionary and only owed if the Plaintiff stayed with the Defendants through a certain date. Discretionary bonuses are outside the purview of the Massachusetts Wage Act. Defendants argued these points and the Hampden Superior Court ruled that this discretionary bonus was not under purview of the Massachusetts Wage Act and not payable to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing all counts in favor of the Defendants.