Royal

Increased Scrutiny into Sex Discrimination in Construction

April 13, 2023

According to the latest publication from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, women make up approximately 10 percent of the workers in the construction industry.


Last year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) held a hearing to discuss discriminatory practices in the construction industry. Since then, they have filed several lawsuits against construction industry employers to address the discriminatory practices.


In 2022, two new federal laws were enacted expanding protections for pregnant workers. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), which goes into effect on June 27, 2023, gives workers the right to receive reasonable accommodations such as: light duty, breaks, or a stool to sit on, for pregnancy, childbirth recovery, and related medical conditions, including lactation, unless it would be an undue hardship on the employer. The Providing Urgent Maternal Protections (PUMP) for Nursing Mothers Act expands breastfeeding accommodations to exempt employees.


Moreover, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act preserves an employee’s right to litigate sexual assault and/or sexual harassment claims in court, making pre-dispute arbitration agreements optional for these claims.


In summary, it is important to implement policies and procedures designed to prevent, detect, and remedy unlawful harassment. It is important to train all employees on appropriate behavior in the workplace. It is important to take complaints seriously, to investigate them, and to implement corrective action designed to end harassment. And lastly, it is important to review your hiring practices, opportunities for promotion, and pay for women in the workforce. 


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

April 2, 2025
A recent court decision in Pennsylvania offers clarification that employers cannot take adverse action for marijuana use against individuals who possess medical marijuana cards, at least under Pennsylvania’s Medical Marijuana Act. In this decision, an individual received a conditional job offer for a non-safety sensitive position, contingent on a drug test. The individual disclosed his state-certified use of medical marijuana to treat anxiety, depression and ADHD, assuring the employer that it wouldn’t affect job performance or safety. After a positive test for marijuana, the employer rescinded the offer, citing safety concerns. The individual sued the employer under the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (“MMA”) and disability discrimination under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). The Court allowed the individual’s claim under the MMA to proceed, potentially creating substantial precedent for tolerance of individual medical marijuana use in non-safety sensitive positions. The Court specifically noted that MMA protects individuals not just from discrimination based on card holder status, but also for adverse actions based solely on lawful medical marijuana use. The Court otherwise dismissed the individual’s claims under the PHRA because the PHRA does not require employers to accommodate medical marijuana use, even if it is prescribed for a legitimate medical condition. While a Pennsylvania decision, this decision potentially has rippling implications that will affect Massachusetts employers and employers in states where medical marijuana use is allowed under state law, which is allowed in some manner in 44 states. Employer Takeaways Understand State-Specific Protections : Laws regarding medical marijuana use differ widely across states. In some areas, cardholder status is protected, while in others, it is not. Employers operating in multiple states must ensure their hiring and accommodation practices comply with the relevant laws in each state. Base Safety Concerns on Job-Specific Evidence : General or speculative safety concerns are insufficient, particularly in states with strict employee protections. Safety risks cited should be specific, evidence-based, and directly related to the essential functions of the job. Review Drug Testing and Accommodation Policies: Update your policies to reflect current state laws and clarify how your organization manages disclosures of medical marijuana use, especially during the hiring process .  If you have any queries regarding drug testing or other workplace accommodations following this ruling, it is prudent to contact legal counsel. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
March 28, 2025
The Royal Law Firm was a Finalist for Best Law Firm in The Best of The Valley Readers' Poll for 2025, as published by the Valley Advocate! Thank you to everyone who voted for us, and to those of you who trust us to help you in times of need. Click here to check out all of the category winners and finalists.
Share by: