Royal

New Guidance for Remote Work and Leave

March 13, 2023

In February 2023, the federal Department of Labor (DOL) issued new guidance about employees working remotely from home.


The DOL confirmed that the rules for compensating employees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), for break time apply whether the employee is working onsite or remote. Break times of 20 minutes or less are treated as compensable time.  A longer break is not compensable time, so long as the employee is completely relieved from duties, which is defined as: (i) being “told in advance that they may leave the job and they will not have to commence work until a specified hour,” or (ii) that they may “freely choose the hour at which they resume working and the time is long enough for the employees to effectively use their own purposes.” The DOL also noted the FLSA’s requirement to provide reasonable break time for employees to express breast milk for their nursing child with a space that is “shielded from view” also applies to remote work. This means “ensuring that an employee is free from observation by any employer provided or required video system”. Such breaks are also compensable if the employee is not completely relieved from duties.


The DOL also discussed Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) eligibility requirements. An employer with at least 50 employees within a 75 mile radius of the worksite must provide FMLA benefits to employees who have worked 1,250 hours in the preceding 12 months. The DOL explained that for remote employees the pertinent worksite is not their residence but is “the office to which they report or from which their assignments are made.” 


The DOL also addressed whether an employer is required to allow an employee, with an FMLA-covered serious health condition, to use FMLA leave to shorten their workday where the regular schedule for the position would otherwise be more. The DOL stated that employees who are eligible for FMLA leave must be permitted to take it on a reduced schedule basis, and that an employer may not simply reduce their workday as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA thereby making them ineligible for group health insurance benefits. Eligible employees must be permitted to use FMLA leave until they have exhausted their leave, and if a reduced schedule does not result in the equivalent of 12 weeks of leave in a 12-month period, the employer is required to provide it indefinitely. Also, the hours of FMLA leave the employee is entitled must be based on the employee’s regularly scheduled workweek, and not on the reduced one, so an employee who is regularly scheduled 50-hours per week (not counting voluntary overtime) would be entitled to use 600 hours of FMLA leave in a 12-month period, to shorten their schedule to 40 hours per week. Lastly, the DOL found that if an employee, who requires a reduced schedule, exhausts their FMLA leave, the employer is obligated to consider continuing the reduction as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, and an employee may offer, and an employee may voluntarily accept, a reduced schedule as a reasonable accommodation in lieu of taking FMLA leave.


As a result, more remote employees are likely to meet the FMLA’s eligibility requirements than employers may have previously assumed.  Employers with a remote workforce should check their wage and hour and FMLA policies to ensure compliance, as well as consider the applicability of the FMLA when an employee requests a reduced schedule as an accommodation.


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

April 2, 2025
A recent court decision in Pennsylvania offers clarification that employers cannot take adverse action for marijuana use against individuals who possess medical marijuana cards, at least under Pennsylvania’s Medical Marijuana Act. In this decision, an individual received a conditional job offer for a non-safety sensitive position, contingent on a drug test. The individual disclosed his state-certified use of medical marijuana to treat anxiety, depression and ADHD, assuring the employer that it wouldn’t affect job performance or safety. After a positive test for marijuana, the employer rescinded the offer, citing safety concerns. The individual sued the employer under the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (“MMA”) and disability discrimination under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). The Court allowed the individual’s claim under the MMA to proceed, potentially creating substantial precedent for tolerance of individual medical marijuana use in non-safety sensitive positions. The Court specifically noted that MMA protects individuals not just from discrimination based on card holder status, but also for adverse actions based solely on lawful medical marijuana use. The Court otherwise dismissed the individual’s claims under the PHRA because the PHRA does not require employers to accommodate medical marijuana use, even if it is prescribed for a legitimate medical condition. While a Pennsylvania decision, this decision potentially has rippling implications that will affect Massachusetts employers and employers in states where medical marijuana use is allowed under state law, which is allowed in some manner in 44 states. Employer Takeaways 1. Understand State-Specific Protections : Laws regarding medical marijuana use differ widely across states. In some areas, cardholder status is protected, while in others, it is not. Employers operating in multiple states must ensure their hiring and accommodation practices comply with the relevant laws in each state. 2. Base Safety Concerns on Job-Specific Evidence : General or speculative safety concerns are insufficient, particularly in states with strict employee protections. Safety risks cited should be specific, evidence-based, and directly related to the essential functions of the job. 3. Review Drug Testing and Accommodation Policies: Update your policies to reflect current state laws and clarify how your organization manages disclosures of medical marijuana use, especially during the hiring process . If you have any queries regarding drug testing or other workplace accommodations following this ruling, it is prudent to contact legal counsel. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
March 28, 2025
The Royal Law Firm was a Finalist for Best Law Firm in The Best of The Valley Readers' Poll for 2025, as published by the Valley Advocate! Thank you to everyone who voted for us, and to those of you who trust us to help you in times of need. Click here to check out all of the category winners and finalists.
Share by: