Royal

New York Governor Kathy Hochul Vetoes Senate Bill Aimed at Non-Compete Agreements

January 4, 2024

On December 22, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed New York Senate Bill S3100A, which broadly prohibited employee non-compete agreements. The bill had previously been passed by both New York legislative houses in June 2023. The bill had been criticized by Governor Hochul for three main reasons: 1) the bill did not contain a salary cap, but instead broadly prohibited non-compete agreements at every level of employment, no matter the compensation level or bargaining power of the employee, 2) there was no carve-out for non-competes entered into in connection with the sale of a business, and 3) there was no exception for non-compete agreements or provisions providing for the forfeiture of compensation if an employee left to join a competitor or non-compete agreements providing for garden leave pay (pay during the non-competition period) in place of competition.

In November 2023, Governor Hochul had expressed concerns regarding the scope of the bill, stating that she supported limiting the use of non-compete agreements for low to middle income workers earning under $250,000. However, when the bill was sent to Governor Hochul for approval, the bill was not amended to address the above concerns or to put a salary cap on prohibited non-competes. Within the 10-day consideration period after the bill was sent to Governor Hochul, Governor Hochul and the New York legislature could not come to agreement with respect to a salary cap, which Governor Hochul had previously stated was vital to protect lower to middle income employees, while permitting businesses to retain highly compensated individuals. The legislature is expected to reintroduce non-compete legislation in 2024.

 

If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.


 



April 10, 2025
Though the Difference Makers event has come to a close, let's continue to shine a light on the transformative power of giving back to our community! Every year, The Royal Law Firm is humbled to be a part of this incredible event that spotlights the brightest stars in our community. We can't wait to celebrate the 2026 Difference Makers and the boundless impact they'll have!
April 9, 2025
The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant, a school district, in a claim brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court agreed that the Plaintiff, a teacher, did not qualify for accommodation under the ADA because she could perform her job fully without the accommodation. It was agreed upon that her job functions could be performed but under “great duress and harm.” The Plaintiff appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court disagreed with the USDC NY decision, stating that “an employee may qualify for a reasonable accommodation even if she can perform the essential functions of her job without the accommodation.” For Employers This ruling reminds us that the crux of the ADA is if the accommodation is reasonable, aimed at mitigating disability related limitations, and does not place an undue burden on the employer, the employer is expected to fulfill that accommodation. Every request for accommodation should be looked at on a case-by-case basis. A broad metric should not be how a business decides if it should allow any requests for ADA accommodation(s). The attorneys at The Royal Law Firm are dedicated to helping employers navigate ADA accommodations and interpretations in their day-to-day practice and handbooks. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
Share by: