Royal

Pay Transparency in New York

September 14, 2023

In an effort to address wage gaps, twelve jurisdictions across the nation have enacted pay transparency legislation with New York being the most recent state. The New York pay transparency law, Bill No. S9427A, will go into effect on September 17, 2023. This law will apply to any advertisement, promotion, or transfer opportunity that will either be physically performed at least in part in New York, or that will physically be performed outside of New York but reported to a supervisor, office, or worksite in New York. Such legislation requires employers, with four or more employees, to publicly disclose salary ranges or a fixed level of compensation in job postings for positions within the state. The New York state law would also require employers to keep records of the compensation ranges for each position and the job descriptions. If the position is commission-based, employers can satisfy this by disclosing that in the job description. The legislation also includes an anti-retaliation provision against applicants and current employees for exercising their rights under the pay transparency law. The legislation does not explicitly create a private right of action and violations are subject to investigation and prosecution by the Commissioner. Civil penalties would not exceed $1,000 for the first violation, $2,000 for the second violation, and $3,000 for the third and further violations.

There are lingering questions in regard to whether the law applies to employers with four employees in New York, or four employees total including ones outside the state. In the legislation, there is no specific length of time mentioned for employers to retain records of compensation ranges and job descriptions. The New York Department of Labor may issue further guidance to answer these questions.

If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288. 

March 5, 2025
A recent Massachusetts ruling regarding unpaid bonuses is extremely important for employers in light of the wave of litigation involving the Massachusetts Wage Act. In this case, Plaintiff brought claims under the Massachusetts Wage Act for unpaid bonuses under ERISA, alleging that her former employer deprived her of guaranteed bonus payments. This case is of particular interest as it is rare for a court to consider the substantive nature of a case during the dismissal stage. However, in this case, the judge ruled on the substantive nature of the wages Plaintiff claimed, outside of the purview of a typical motion to dismiss decision. The court decided that the compensation of a bonus under ERISA is “discretionary or contingent upon the employee remaining with the company [and] is not considered a wage subject to the wage act” and dismissed the claims of unpaid wages, only allowing the retaliation claims to proceed. The judge found that bonuses did not constitute wages as they are not earned. This decision can help to decrease employers’ concerns about wage claims, particularly those related to bonuses and deferred compensation.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
February 26, 2025
Recent executive orders issued by the executive branch have raised questions for many employers, especially relating to DEI policies. While it was initially interpreted that the executive orders regarding the presence of DEI policies only applied to federal agencies and companies that receive federal funds, a recent investigation by the Department of Education has raised questions about whether privately funded organizations and companies could face prosecution.  In Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (as known as MIAA), a program not directly funded by the federal government, is being investigated by the Department of Education for an alleged violation of Title IX in allowing transgender individuals to participate in women’s sports. While MIAA’s policy is loosely related to DEI protocols, this investigation seems to declare that support of DEI-type programs and policies by private companies can be prosecuted akin to this investigation. It is investigations such as these that has led to a movement called “rainbow-hushing,” in which companies drop or quietly rebrand their diversity, equity and inclusion programs to avoid prosecution. While confusion and contradictions between anti-discrimination laws and the new wave of executive orders issued by the executive branch remain abound, it is prudent practice to seek legal counsel to avoid prosecution under the new executive orders, akin to MIAA. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
Share by: