Royal

Pay Transparency in New York

September 14, 2023

In an effort to address wage gaps, twelve jurisdictions across the nation have enacted pay transparency legislation with New York being the most recent state. The New York pay transparency law, Bill No. S9427A, will go into effect on September 17, 2023. This law will apply to any advertisement, promotion, or transfer opportunity that will either be physically performed at least in part in New York, or that will physically be performed outside of New York but reported to a supervisor, office, or worksite in New York. Such legislation requires employers, with four or more employees, to publicly disclose salary ranges or a fixed level of compensation in job postings for positions within the state. The New York state law would also require employers to keep records of the compensation ranges for each position and the job descriptions. If the position is commission-based, employers can satisfy this by disclosing that in the job description. The legislation also includes an anti-retaliation provision against applicants and current employees for exercising their rights under the pay transparency law. The legislation does not explicitly create a private right of action and violations are subject to investigation and prosecution by the Commissioner. Civil penalties would not exceed $1,000 for the first violation, $2,000 for the second violation, and $3,000 for the third and further violations.

There are lingering questions in regard to whether the law applies to employers with four employees in New York, or four employees total including ones outside the state. In the legislation, there is no specific length of time mentioned for employers to retain records of compensation ranges and job descriptions. The New York Department of Labor may issue further guidance to answer these questions.

If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288. 

Massachusetts’ Superior Court Judge Rules Recording in Workplace Admissible

February 19, 2025
The Massachusetts Superior Court found that Massachusetts’ wiretap statue does not bar employers from using allegedly illegally obtained recordings in civil proceedings. In a recent case, an employee claimed she was forced to resign. Plaintiff’s coworker recorded an argument between the Plaintiff and her supervisor without her consent and shared it with supervisors. The employee then sued for discrimination and retaliation, along with two counts for violation of the wiretap statute. Massachusetts is a two-party consent state but, in this case, it was found that the consent of only one party was needed because nothing in the Wiretap Statute bars the use of an allegedly illegally obtained communication in a civil proceeding. The court found that the provisions about the use of illegally obtained communications in evidence are limited to criminal trials. However, depending on the court, results may differ, as this recording was central to proving and/or disproving the Plaintiff’s claim, and as such, the recording was indispensable as a piece of evidence. Issues with unauthorized recordings have been arising all the time in civil proceedings because recording devices are everywhere, whether they be a cell phone, laptop or other recording device. This ruling is good for employers, as if there is an otherwise inadmissible recording that is made that disproves an employee’s claims, it can be admissible as evidence if meets the same scenario above. However, employers must be careful to use these recordings as they may be inadmissible and may not show the same thing that the employer believes in the court’s eyes. This being said, it is prudent to consult an attorney before utilizing a recording for any employment action or in legal action to avoid unwanted consequences. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

After the DEI Executive Order

February 14, 2025
What Are the Compliance Requirements for Private Employers?
Share by: