Royal

Trader Joe's Location Pushes to Remove Union: What’s Happening?

August 14, 2024

By: Sabba Salebaigi-Tse, Esq.

Recent developments at the Trader Joe’s location in Hadley, MA have garnered attention as employees filed a petition to decertify their union. The petition, submitted on July 30, 2024, with the help of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, marks a significant shift for a store that was the company’s first to unionize less than two years ago.


Employee Dissatisfaction

Employees at the Hadley store have expressed dissatisfaction with the union’s performance. Some who initially supported union representation are now claiming that the union has failed to negotiate effectively and address workers’ concerns. As a result, nearly 50% of the store’s employees are backing the decertification effort.


Decertification Process

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has yet to fully review the decertification petition. If the NLRB approves it, an election will be scheduled to determine if the majority of employees want to keep or remove the union. Trader Joe’s has stated it supports the employees’ right to choose their representation freely and is committed to a fair process.


Concerns Raised

Employees have criticized the union for using aggressive tactics and making misleading claims about working conditions. They argue that the union has caused division rather than improving the work environment. Some have publicly stated that they felt more respected by management before the unionization process.


Next Steps

As the NLRB reviews the petition and decides on the next steps, the outcome will be pivotal for the Hadley store’s workforce. A successful decertification vote could reshape the store’s labor relations landscape and influence discussions on unionization at other locations.


The situation at the Trader Joe’s location in Hadley, MA illustrates how employee views on unions can change over time. It emphasizes the need for clear and effective labor representation and shows the evolving nature of workplace advocacy. Employers who stay informed and adapt to these changes can better manage union-related issues and potentially benefit from a well-handled unionization process.


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.


Sabba Salebaigi-Tse is an attorney who specializes in labor and employment-law matters at the Royal Law Firm LLP, a woman-owned, women-managed corporate law firm that is certified as a women’s business enterprise with the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office, the National Assoc. of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, and the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council.

Employer’s Counterclaims in Response to Suit Under Wage Act Dismissed Per Employee’s Anti-SLAPP Motion

January 15, 2025
An employer brought counterclaims of malicious prosecution and abuse-of-process in response to a Wage Act suit brought by an employee. The Appeals Court cited that the employer’s counterclaims should have been dismissed under the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) law. Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to provide parties with a way to quickly dismiss meritless lawsuits filed against them, usually in response to a lawsuit. The plaintiff in this case, an hourly laborer, claimed that his employer violated the Wage Act by failing to pay him for four of the six weeks he worked for them. The employer refuted these allegations, stating that the employee had only worked for two weeks, that he had been paid in full and then brought counterclaims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The District Court judge denied the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims under the anti-SLAPP law. When brought to the Appeals Court, the decision was reversed; the Appeals Court stated that the defendants did not meet the burden of showing that plaintiff’s claims lacked an objectively reasonable factual basis. This ruling suggests that it might behoove an employer to pause and wait to see if a plaintiff’s Wage Act claim fails before filing a counterclaim of abuse of process or malicious prosecution in response.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

Compensation Plans and Contingent Compensation Pitfalls

January 8, 2025
Attorney Trevor Brice hosted a seminar on Wednesday, January 8, 2025, discussing the possible issues with current compensation plans and contingent compensation pitfalls made possible by recent court rulings. Some of the topics discussed included: Issues with current compensation plans under the FLSA Restrictive Covenants and Compensation Plans Problems with Commission-Based Compensation Plans and Possible Solutions When a Bonus is not actually a bonus and issues under the Massachusetts Wage Act This seminar was perfect for H.R. professionals and anyone in a management position. Please feel free to contact any of the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm if you have any questions on this topic!
Share by: