Connecticut Passes Law Legalizing Cannabis

July 1, 2021

Connecticut passed a new law legalizing cannabis. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will be able to lawfully possess, use, and consume recreational cannabis.


Smoking Restrictions

The law contains provisions restricting smoking that will affect employers. These provisions will go into effect October 1, 2021.

All employers must ban smoking and the use of electronic nicotine and cannabis vaping products in any area of their facility. Employers can no longer designate a smoking room for employees. The law applies to the inside of buildings as well as 25 feet from any doorway, window, or vent. Exceptions are limited and include tobacco or cannabis research facilities and specific licensed establishments. Employers also have the option to designate their entire property as a nonsmoking area.


Employment-Related Provisions

Another section of the law contains several provisions that will affect employers and their employment policies. These provisions will be effective July 1, 2022.


  • Employers can implement policies prohibiting the use of cannabis by employees, except for qualified patients under the state’s medical marijuana laws. Any such policy must be in writing and be made available to employees and prospective employees before it goes into effect.


  • Employers cannot terminate or take any adverse action against an employee because the employee uses cannabis outside the workplace, except when an employer has an established policy in place. 


  • Employers cannot terminate or take any adverse action against an employee or prospective employee for using cannabis prior to employment, unless it would put the employer in violation of a federal contract. 


  • The law affirms that employers have the right to maintain a drug and alcohol-free workplace and that employers may take adverse action when they have a reasonable suspicion of an employee’s cannabis use while working or when an employee shows “specific, articulable symptoms” of cannabis use while working. 


  • Employers can terminate or take adverse action against an employee after a positive drug test if the employer has a reasonable suspicion the employee is using cannabis at work, if the testing was part of an established random drug testing policy, or if the testing was for a prospective employee with a conditional job offer.


Certain employers are exempt, including: mining, utilities, construction, manufacturing, transportation/delivery, educational services, healthcare or social services, and justice, public order, and safety activities.


The law also exempts certain employee positions, including: firefighters, EMTs, police officers, positions requiring operation of a motor vehicle that requires drug testing under state or federal law, positions requiring certification of completion of a course in construction safety and health approved by OSHA, positions requiring supervision or care of children, medical patients or vulnerable persons, positions for which the law would conflict with federal law, positions funded by a federal grant, or if the provisions would conflict with an employment contract or collective bargaining agreement, and positions that an employer determines have the potential to adversely impact the health or safety of employees or the public.


Individuals aggrieved by an employer’s violation of the law can bring a civil action in superior court and may be awarded reinstatement their job or job offer, back pay, and attorney’s fees.

 

For any questions or concerns about this new Connecticut law, please contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

By The Royal Law Firm September 15, 2025
Welcome Zeno!
By The Royal Law Firm August 19, 2025
Employers regularly wonder: “Can I fire someone for that?” You might assume the answer is simple, especially in an at-will state like Massachusetts. But the reality is more complex. Missteps can land your business in court. Here’s how to avoid them and keep your company focused on growth, not litigation. Myth: “At-Will Means Any Reason Goes” At-will employment allows termination without contractual cause. Yet anti-discrimination laws and retaliation protections still apply. Even a valid reason, like poor performance, becomes risky if the employee recently complained about harassment, requested an accommodation, or reported a safety issue. Terminating soon after a complaint invites legal trouble. For example, consider firing Sarah for repeated tardiness. But what if she reported sexual harassment a few weeks earlier? Timing alone can create exposure. Document performance issues as they arise. Also, check if the employee recently returned from Family and Medical Leave (FMLA) or Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML). A Springfield auto repair shop faced a claim after firing a worker the day after he returned from PFML to care for his newborn. The company blamed tardiness, but the timing triggered months of legal headaches. Myth: “No Documentation Needed” Some employers assume that no paperwork is necessary under at-will rules. That approach creates unnecessary risk. Without records, even lawful firings appear questionable. Weak evidence damages credibility. Imagine Tom, a low performer who never received formal feedback. If you fire him after years of positive reviews, expect scrutiny. Always provide timely written warnings and accurate performance evaluations. Keep emails, attendance records, and coaching notes. Would your records persuade a jury that the termination was justified? Myth: “We Treated Everyone Fairly” Fair treatment requires consistency. If one employee is fired and another is only warned for the same violation, questions follow. Consider two salespeople, Mike and Jose, both caught inflating sales numbers. Mike receives a warning. Jose gets fired. If Jose claims racial bias, inconsistent discipline strengthens his argument. Review prior disciplinary decisions. Can you show a clear record of equal treatment? Myth: “We Can Share the Reason Widely” Managers sometimes explain a termination too broadly, believing transparency protects the company. In reality, public disclosure creates legal risk. An employee fired for theft sued his employer after leadership announced it to the entire staff. Even truthful statements, shared excessively or with ill will, can spark defamation claims. A local example: a Chicopee retailer emailed all employees naming a worker fired for alleged cash shortages. That email became Exhibit A in court. Limit disclosure to those who truly need to know. Avoiding Retaliation Claims Retaliation is the most common EEOC claim. Firing someone after they complain about discrimination, request leave, or raise pay concerns often leads to lawsuits. Subtle actions can count too—cutting hours, assigning undesirable shifts, or excluding them from meetings. Did Lisa report a wage issue last week? If she now gets the worst shifts, her attorney will call it punishment. Train managers to pause and ask: “Does this look like payback?” In one Springfield restaurant, a server who complained about tips was fired days later for “attitude.” The MCAD viewed the timing as retaliation, and the case settled quickly. Managing the Termination Meeting Professionally How you fire someone matters. Keep the meeting short and calm. Speak plainly. Avoid debate. Bring a neutral witness, usually HR. Disable system access and collect company property immediately. For remote workers, coordinate IT to end access during the call. Have you prepared your team to stay composed when an employee gets angry or upset? A concise, professional exit reduces emotion and litigation risk. Reducing Risks Before They Occur You can prevent most legal problems with proactive steps. Train managers to document consistently. Encourage employees to raise concerns early, and respond appropriately when they do. Also, follow Massachusetts requirements: final wages and accrued vacation must be paid promptly, sometimes the same day. Missing or delaying a payment can trigger penalties. Review whether your managers apply standards uniformly. Track disciplinary trends by department or supervisor. In one Holyoke warehouse, inconsistent discipline across shifts led to multiple claims that could have been avoided with routine audits. Quick Pre-Termination Checklist Document the issue in writing. Confirm whether the employee recently exercised protected rights (complaint, FMLA, PFML, workers’ comp). Ensure similar cases were handled consistently. Complete a fair investigation and allow the employee to respond. Prepare final pay and unused vacation in compliance with Massachusetts law. Bottom Line Employee terminations happen. Legal trouble does not have to. Careful documentation, consistent actions, and thoughtful communication protect your business. Before acting, stop and ask: have we done this right? Taking these steps helps you confidently answer, “Can I fire someone for that?” That answer should never rest on guesswork. Michael P. Lewis, is an attorney who specializes in labor and employment-law matters at the Royal Law Firm LLP , a woman-owned, women-managed corporate law firm that is certified as a women’s business enterprise with the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office, the National Assoc. of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, and the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288. Michael P. Lewis wrote this article which was featured in BusinessWest. Click here to visit their website.